The in-text reporting of statistics using a generative AI tool/LLM is not permissible due to concerns over the authenticity, integrity, and validity of the data produced, although the use of such a tool to aid in the analysis of the work would be permissible.

The generation or reporting of results using a generative AI tool/LLM is not permissible, for as per Emerald’s authorship criteria, the author(s) must be responsible for the creation and interpretation of their work and accountable for its accuracy, integrity, and validity.Copywriting any part of an article using a generative AI tool/LLM would not be permissible, including the generation of the abstract or the literature review, for as per Emerald’s authorship criteria, the author(s) must be responsible for the work and accountable for its accuracy, integrity, and validity.If your article involves human participants, you must ensure you have considered whether or not you require ethical approval for your research, and include this information as part of your submission.The Editor and Publisher reserve the right to determine whether the use of an AI tool is permissible. Standard tools that are used to improve spelling and grammar are not included within the parameters of this guidance. In accordance with COPE’s position statement on AI tools, Large Language Models cannot be credited with authorship as they are incapable of conceptualising a research design without human direction and cannot be accountable for the integrity, originality, and validity of the published work. The author(s) must describe the content created or modified as well as appropriately cite the name and version of the AI tool used any additional works drawn on by the AI tool should also be appropriately cited and referenced.Exclude anyone who hasn’t contributed to the paper, or who has chosen not to be associated with the research.Include anyone who has made a substantial and meaningful contribution to the submission (anyone else involved in the paper should be listed in the acknowledgements).Read about our research ethics for authorship. These state that you must:.Treat communications between you and the journal editor as confidential until an editorial decision has been made.

This includes investigating and resolving any questions about accuracy or research integrity Be accountable for all aspects of your work.Respond swiftly to any queries during the publication process.There are also some responsibilities that sit with you as the author. Our goal is to provide you with a professional and courteous experience at each stage of the review and publication process. These details can be found in the Editorial Team section. For queries post acceptance, please contact the Supplier Project Manager. For queries relating to the status of your paper pre-decision, please contact the Editor or Journal Editorial Office.

Readcube papers.